Skip to content

More leads is not always the real problem

Sometimes marketing teams need to push back, politely but firmly, and ask a better question: what happens to leads once they arrive?

Somewhere along the way, “we need more leads” became the default explanation for almost any shortfall in sales. It is a neat answer. It is also often the wrong one.

In plenty of B2B businesses, the real problem sits further down the line. Calls are missed. Enquiries wait too long for a reply. Follow-up is patchy. Prospects get handed from one person to another and lose confidence. The website promises one thing, the sales conversation suggests another, and the customer experience does not join up with either.

When that happens, marketing becomes the easiest place to point the finger. It is visible. It is measurable, at least on the surface. There is a tempting story that says the leads must be worse than they used to be. This may not be true.

A business can lose a surprising amount of growth simply by handling demand badly. We have all seen versions of it. The lead form is submitted, but nobody replies until the next day. The sales team cherry-picks the easiest-looking enquiries and ignores the awkward ones. None of this shows up neatly in the ‘marketing dashboard’.

In very small firms, weak points get hidden inside the day-to-day rush. If one person is running campaigns, answering calls, pricing jobs and chasing invoices, it is very easy to conclude that lead quality has dropped when the real issue is that the process can no longer cope properly with the demand already coming in.

Push back

In larger firms, the dynamic is different, but no less familiar. Marketing is expected to feed the machine, while sales and customer experience sit elsewhere. If growth stalls, pressure moves upstream. We start hearing that leads are too weak, that volume is down, or that the market is not serious enough. Sometimes marketing teams need to pose the question of what happens to leads once they arrive.

If sales teams are under pressure, they can become more selective in how they define a good lead. A lead that needs educating may get labelled as low quality when in fact it just needs a better process. Marketing then gets told to find hotter prospects, which usually means paying more for less volume while ignoring opportunities.

None of this lets marketing off the hook. We still need to bring in the right kind of demand. But in businesses with longer decisions or more human sales processes, lead generation is only the start of the story. It is perfectly possible to have a marketing problem, but it is equally possible to have a sales handling problem, a service problem, or a trust problem, all of which marketing gets blamed for because it’s nearest to the numbers.