Skip to content

“Human content creation remains unparalleled”

Here’s an interesting experiment, carried out by the Marketing Insider Group. In AI vs. Human Content: What Actually Gets You Results? the authors set out to answer the question of “whether AI tools like ChatGPT could match or even surpass the quality and effectiveness of human-authored content.” It’s well worth a read, but here’s a summary of the findings, which I got ChatGPT 4 to author, because, well, it just seemed appropriate:

“When it comes to authenticity, human content distinctly stands out. It’s characterised by its originality and the unique perspectives it offers, along with a personal touch that resonates deeply with audiences. AI, while efficient in its processes, often falls short in infusing this depth of personalisation into the content it generates. This aspect is crucial for content that aims to establish a genuine connection with its audience.

“Creativity is another domain where humans have a clear edge. Human content creators demonstrate remarkable skill in wordplay, humour, and injecting emotional depth into their work. These are areas where AI, despite its advances, struggles. Governed by algorithms, AI-generated content has yet to master the level of creative expression that comes naturally to humans.

“From a cost perspective, AI has a notable advantage. The use of AI tools for content creation is significantly more cost-effective compared to the human-led process. This cost-effectiveness stems from the speed and efficiency of AI, leading to lower operational costs. In terms of time efficiency, AI also excels by considerably reducing the time required for drafting content. This rapid content generation, however, is often offset by the need for more editing and refinement compared to human-created content, which tends to be more polished from the outset.

“Scalability is another area where AI shines. It is capable of generating large volumes of content swiftly, a feat difficult to achieve through human efforts alone. Human content creation, on the other hand, is inherently limited by individual productivity and available resources.

“Quality remains a domain where human content maintains superiority. Content crafted by humans tends to engage and resonate more effectively with audiences. This is likely due to the nuanced understanding and emotional intelligence that humans bring to the table, aspects that AI has not fully replicated.

“In terms of trust, content authored by humans is perceived as more trustworthy. This perception is likely influenced by the authenticity and emotional resonance inherent in human-created content. AI, while making strides in this area, still faces challenges in building similar levels of trust with audiences.

“In summary, while AI offers undeniable benefits in terms of speed, cost, and scalability, it is evident that for content that demands creativity, quality, and an authentic human touch, human content creation remains unparalleled. For senior professionals looking to make informed decisions in their content strategies, understanding these nuances is key to leveraging the strengths of both human and AI content creation effectively.”