<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>Business Marketing Online (BMON): Google AdWords Management &#187; Industrial Search Engine Marketing</title> <atom:link href="http://www.bmon.co.uk/category/industrial-search-engine-marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.bmon.co.uk</link> <description>Google AdWords management for industrial and scientific companies</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:00:12 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>A more interesting PR challenge</title><link>http://www.bmon.co.uk/2009/01/a-more-interesting-pr-challenge/</link> <comments>http://www.bmon.co.uk/2009/01/a-more-interesting-pr-challenge/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Chris Rand</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Industrial Search Engine Marketing]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmon.co.uk/leadgeneration/?p=401</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Have you got a decent technical writer in-house or on tap externally who you don&#039;t think is being utilised effectively writing press releases? There&#039;s a good tip in the article Hubpages and Squidoo for Industrial SEO on Industrial Search Engine &#8230;</p><p><p><a
href="http://www.bmon.co.uk/2009/01/a-more-interesting-pr-challenge/">A more interesting PR challenge</a></p></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you got a decent technical writer in-house or on tap externally who you don&#039;t think is being utilised effectively writing press releases? There&#039;s a good tip in the article <a
href="http://www.industrialsearchenginemarketing.com/blog/2009/01/19/hubpages-and-squidoo-for-industrial-seo/">Hubpages and Squidoo for Industrial SEO</a> on <strong>Industrial Search Engine Marketing</strong>: why not post some content on the <a
href="http://hubpages.com/">Hubpages</a> or <a
href="http://www.squidoo.com/">Squidoo</a> sites? These will give you valuable incoming links, and more importantly, will be good PR in the wider sense, helping establish your company as an authority on its subject. Go on &#8211; give your PR writer a more interesting challenge today.</p><p><p><a
href="http://www.bmon.co.uk/2009/01/a-more-interesting-pr-challenge/">A more interesting PR challenge</a></p></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.bmon.co.uk/2009/01/a-more-interesting-pr-challenge/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Is Facebook relevant to us in industry?</title><link>http://www.bmon.co.uk/2008/12/is-facebook-relevant-to-us-in-industry/</link> <comments>http://www.bmon.co.uk/2008/12/is-facebook-relevant-to-us-in-industry/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:00:11 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Chris Rand</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Industrial Search Engine Marketing]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmon.co.uk/leadgeneration/?p=294</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Here&#039;s an interesting discussion. Industrial Search Engine Marketing asks: &#034;(is) Facebook a Viable Channel for Industrial Marketing?&#034; and the answer is that it could well be. Now, like me, in a business context you may well gloss over anyone talking &#8230;</p><p><p><a
href="http://www.bmon.co.uk/2008/12/is-facebook-relevant-to-us-in-industry/">Is Facebook relevant to us in industry?</a></p></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#039;s an interesting discussion. <strong>Industrial Search Engine Marketing</strong> asks: <a
href="http://www.industrialsearchenginemarketing.com/blog/2008/12/01/is-facebook-really-a-viable-channel-for-online-marketing/">&#034;(is) Facebook a Viable Channel for Industrial Marketing?&#034;</a> and the answer is that it could well be.</p><p>Now, like me, in a business context you may well gloss over anyone talking about Facebook and social media in general, thinking that it&#039;s of no consequence. But there&#039;s a growing (if still small) amount of business related activity going on in Facebook, and it might well be worth some of your time, especially if you&#039;re a regular Facebook user and know your way around. Read the article and see what you think.</p><p><p><a
href="http://www.bmon.co.uk/2008/12/is-facebook-relevant-to-us-in-industry/">Is Facebook relevant to us in industry?</a></p></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.bmon.co.uk/2008/12/is-facebook-relevant-to-us-in-industry/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Attractive looking URLs rule OK</title><link>http://www.bmon.co.uk/2008/11/attractive-looking-urls-rule-ok/</link> <comments>http://www.bmon.co.uk/2008/11/attractive-looking-urls-rule-ok/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:00:20 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Chris Rand</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Industrial Search Engine Marketing]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmon.co.uk/leadgeneration/?p=158</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Here&#039;s an article which backs up something I&#039;d been fairly sure about for quite a while. According to Improve click-throughs with the right URL names on Industrial Search Engine Marketing, the actual URL (the web page address) in Google results &#8230;</p><p><p><a
href="http://www.bmon.co.uk/2008/11/attractive-looking-urls-rule-ok/">Attractive looking URLs rule OK</a></p></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#039;s an article which backs up something I&#039;d been fairly sure about for quite a while. According to <a
href="http://www.industrialsearchenginemarketing.com/blog/2008/09/24/improve-click-troughs-with-the-right-url-names/">Improve click-throughs with the right URL names</a> on <strong>Industrial Search Engine Marketing</strong>, the actual URL (the web page address) in Google results (the bit in green) is becoming more important. I agree. If I type in &#034;widget review&#034; into Google, I know that 9 out of 10 results which come up are not going to be reviews of widgets, but shopping sites selling widgets which have managed to score well for the term &#034;widget review&#034; without having any decent reviews. I&#039;m sure you&#039;ve seen the same thing. So I then scan down the URLs to see the site names, and if one of them is &#034;www.widget-world-magazine.com&#034; or something similar, that&#039;s the one I click.</p><p>This becomes a habit after a while, even when it&#039;s not strictly necessary. So what do we take away from this? If your system allows you to give your web pages decent names, use that capability. If you&#039;re reading this page on the web, look at the URL (or if you&#039;re reading my email, <a
href="http://www.bmon.co.uk/leadgeneration/2008/11/attractive-looking-urls-rule-ok/">click here</a>). The URL is in the &#034;address bar&#034; at the top of your browser window. If you glanced at that in a set of Google results, it would be a lot more clickable than some long string of random numbers, wouldn&#039;t it?</p><p><p><a
href="http://www.bmon.co.uk/2008/11/attractive-looking-urls-rule-ok/">Attractive looking URLs rule OK</a></p></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.bmon.co.uk/2008/11/attractive-looking-urls-rule-ok/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Double-u double-u double-u</title><link>http://www.bmon.co.uk/2008/10/double-u-double-u-double-u/</link> <comments>http://www.bmon.co.uk/2008/10/double-u-double-u-double-u/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:00:55 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Chris Rand</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Industrial Search Engine Marketing]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmon.co.uk/leadgeneration/?p=140</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>In WWW or Non-WWW, That is the Question on Industrial Search Engine Marketing, the question is asked: Is http://www.mysite.com better than http://mysite.com? &#8211; and there&#039;s a good discussion which you might like to read. But there&#039;s a more fundamental question &#8230;</p><p><p><a
href="http://www.bmon.co.uk/2008/10/double-u-double-u-double-u/">Double-u double-u double-u</a></p></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a
href="http://www.industrialsearchenginemarketing.com/blog/2008/09/26/www-or-non-www-that-is-the-question/">WWW or Non-WWW, That is the Question</a> on <strong>Industrial Search Engine Marketing</strong>, the question is asked: <em>Is http://<strong>www.</strong>mysite.com better than http://mysite.com?</em> &#8211; and there&#039;s a good discussion which you might like to read.</p><p>But there&#039;s a more fundamental question which everyone should ask, right now: does my own website work for the alternative way of typing in the address? For most of us, that means, if the &#034;www.&#034; is missed off, does it work? It ought to, because many, many people now just bash the last part of a website address into their browsers (e.g &#034;<a
href="http://bmon.co.uk">bmon.co.uk</a>&#034;) without the &#034;http://&#034; or the &#034;www.&#034; and you don&#039;t want them to think you&#039;re no longer around. It&#039;s a two-minute job to fix this and it shouldn&#039;t cost you anything because any decent website manager should have had this working from the start.</p><p><p><a
href="http://www.bmon.co.uk/2008/10/double-u-double-u-double-u/">Double-u double-u double-u</a></p></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.bmon.co.uk/2008/10/double-u-double-u-double-u/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Keeping your website &quot;search engine friendly&quot;</title><link>http://www.bmon.co.uk/2008/09/keeping-website-search-engine-friendly/</link> <comments>http://www.bmon.co.uk/2008/09/keeping-website-search-engine-friendly/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 10:00:53 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Chris Rand</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Industrial Search Engine Marketing]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmon.co.uk/leadgeneration/?p=81</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>Here&#039;s a nice little article on the Industrial Search Engine Marketing blog which is worth going through. Quick Site Audit! Is Your Site Search Engine Friendly? gives a small selection of elementary things which your website should and shouldn&#039;t have &#8230;</p><p><p><a
href="http://www.bmon.co.uk/2008/09/keeping-website-search-engine-friendly/">Keeping your website &#034;search engine friendly&#034;</a></p></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#039;s a nice little article on the <strong>Industrial Search Engine Marketing blog</strong> which is worth going through. <a
href="http://www.industrialsearchenginemarketing.com/blog/2008/08/12/quick-site-audit-is-your-site-search-engine-friendly/">Quick Site Audit! Is Your Site Search Engine Friendly?</a> gives a small selection of elementary things which your website should and shouldn&#039;t have if it&#039;s to be &#034;search engine friendly&#034;.</p><p>If you think you might not be conforming to the article&#039;s suggestions, get the problem fixed and you&#039;ll undoubtedly see more traffic from Google. Some of the points may seem quite technical, but throw this at your website designers if you&#039;re unsure and get them to confirm all is in order. It doesn&#039;t do any harm to keep them on their toes.</p><p><p><a
href="http://www.bmon.co.uk/2008/09/keeping-website-search-engine-friendly/">Keeping your website &#034;search engine friendly&#034;</a></p></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.bmon.co.uk/2008/09/keeping-website-search-engine-friendly/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
