<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>Business Marketing Online (BMON): Google AdWords Management &#187; Google Webmaster Central</title> <atom:link href="http://www.bmon.co.uk/category/google-webmaster-central/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.bmon.co.uk</link> <description>Google AdWords management for industrial and scientific companies</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:00:12 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>Presenting PDF documents to the web: a summary</title><link>http://www.bmon.co.uk/2011/09/presenting-pdf-documents-to-the-web-a-summary/</link> <comments>http://www.bmon.co.uk/2011/09/presenting-pdf-documents-to-the-web-a-summary/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:00:57 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Chris Rand</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Google Webmaster Central]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmon.co.uk/?p=3732</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>It's almost certain that you have catalogues, brochures or data sheets on your website as PDF files, and these seem to be appearing ever more strongly in Google's results (so long as you don't hide them from your website visitors by making them only available on request).</p><p><p><a
href="http://www.bmon.co.uk/2011/09/presenting-pdf-documents-to-the-web-a-summary/">Presenting PDF documents to the web: a summary</a></p></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good post on the <strong>Google Webmaster Central Blog</strong> covers <a
href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2011/09/pdfs-in-google-search-results.html?utm_source=The%20BMON%2Eco%2Euk%20Blog">PDFs in Google search results</a>, something which is probably of critical importance to most industrial and scientific companies. It&#039;s almost certain that you have catalogues, brochures or data sheets on your website as PDF files, and these seem to be appearing ever more strongly in Google&#039;s results (so long as you don&#039;t hide them from your website visitors by making them only available on request). We&#039;ve discussed how to present PDF files before, <a
href="http://www.bmon.co.uk/2011/01/how-to-make-your-pdfs-look-smarter-in-the-google-results/">here</a> and <a
href="http://www.bmon.co.uk/2011/03/pdf-documents-handle-with-loving-care/">here</a> and <a
href="http://www.bmon.co.uk/2011/03/how-to-find-out-if-google-can-get-the-text-from-your-pdf-documents/">here</a> and <a
href="http://www.bmon.co.uk/2011/03/why-an-abstract-can-help-your-pdf-documents/">here</a> and <a
href="http://www.bmon.co.uk/2011/03/make-your-pdf-documents-appear-how-youd-want-them-to/">here</a>! However, this article comes straight from the horse&#039;s mouth, so to speak. Do remember a common failing &#8211; which I see quite frequently &#8211; of PDF brochures being scans of original documents. Like any image, Google can&#039;t read the content of these. If you have PDF documents which are scanned images, you need to get proper versions urgently. You can tell images quite easily: the text won&#039;t be selectable.</p><p><p><a
href="http://www.bmon.co.uk/2011/09/presenting-pdf-documents-to-the-web-a-summary/">Presenting PDF documents to the web: a summary</a></p></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.bmon.co.uk/2011/09/presenting-pdf-documents-to-the-web-a-summary/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Oops, I didn&#039;t mean to make that public</title><link>http://www.bmon.co.uk/2011/05/oops-i-didnt-mean-to-make-that-public/</link> <comments>http://www.bmon.co.uk/2011/05/oops-i-didnt-mean-to-make-that-public/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Chris Rand</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Google Webmaster Central]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmon.co.uk/?p=3239</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>How Google has made the process of removing a URL from the results a little easier. You do this through Webmaster Tools.</p><p><p><a
href="http://www.bmon.co.uk/2011/05/oops-i-didnt-mean-to-make-that-public/">Oops, I didn&#039;t mean to make that public</a></p></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m sure we&#039;ve all, at one time or another, posted something online which was private or was just incorrect. While changing the page isn&#039;t hard, what if you&#039;re unlucky enough that a search engine has been round and hoovered up what you&#039;ve written in the meantime? Don&#039;t forget, Google and Bing effectively keep a public copy of the entire web (click the &#039;cached&#039; link next to almost every Google result). Unfortunately, you&#039;ll just have to wait until they come round again. If you have an &#034;XML Sitemap&#034; &#8211; and you should &#8211; then you can mark the page as high priority, ensuring it gets re-crawled the next time the search engine comes round. But you will have to wait.</p><p>Harder than this is getting a page removed from the index completely. Just deleting a page from your site is a hopeless approach; the search engines might take months of crawling and re-crawling your site before they decide that the page really no longer exists. You need to flag the page as having gone, either by redirecting its URL to a replacement page, or listing it as gone, which in Google, you do through Webmaster Tools.</p><p><em>(You have got a Webmaster Tools account, haven&#039;t you? Whoever created your website should have ensured you do, as part of the service, or they weren&#039;t doing their job properly. But if you haven&#039;t got one, sort it out today. It&#039;s in <a
href="http://www.bmon.co.uk/ip/weekly/">week 1</a> of our <a
href="http://www.bmon.co.uk/the-insider-programme/">Insider Programme</a>, that&#039;s how essential it is.)</em></p><p>Now Google has made the process of removing a URL from the results a little easier, and <a
href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2011/05/easier-url-removals-for-site-owners.html">Easier URL removals for site owners</a> on <strong>Google Webmaster Central</strong> gives the full story. You&#039;ll still need &#8211; eventually &#8211; to properly indicate that the page no longer exists, or block the &#034;Googlebot&#034; from crawling the page, but you can fast-track its removal now.</p><p><p><a
href="http://www.bmon.co.uk/2011/05/oops-i-didnt-mean-to-make-that-public/">Oops, I didn&#039;t mean to make that public</a></p></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.bmon.co.uk/2011/05/oops-i-didnt-mean-to-make-that-public/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Are you on top of your 404s?</title><link>http://www.bmon.co.uk/2011/05/are-you-on-top-of-your-404s/</link> <comments>http://www.bmon.co.uk/2011/05/are-you-on-top-of-your-404s/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 17:00:23 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Chris Rand</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Google Webmaster Central]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmon.co.uk/?p=3191</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>As a website owner, it's very important that you correctly serve up 404s - indicating that someone's on the right domain, but the page they've asked for doesn't exist.</p><p><p><a
href="http://www.bmon.co.uk/2011/05/are-you-on-top-of-your-404s/">Are you on top of your 404s?</a></p></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034;404&#034; is one of those bits of computer code geekery which will be recognised by even the non-IT-savvy internet user. But as a website owner, it&#039;s very important that you correctly serve up 404s &#8211; indicating that someone&#039;s on the right domain, but the page they&#039;ve asked for doesn&#039;t exist. An excellent and very thorough introductory post on the <strong>Google Webmaster Central</strong> blog called <a
href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2011/05/do-404s-hurt-my-site.html">Do 404s hurt my site?</a> is a good place to brush up on what a &#034;404&#034; should really be used for. If your website is managed for you by someone else, I&#039;d forward the article to them and get them to confirm that non-existent pages are being handled correctly.</p><p><p><a
href="http://www.bmon.co.uk/2011/05/are-you-on-top-of-your-404s/">Are you on top of your 404s?</a></p></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.bmon.co.uk/2011/05/are-you-on-top-of-your-404s/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Why does one page do better than others?</title><link>http://www.bmon.co.uk/2010/12/why-does-one-page-do-better-than-others/</link> <comments>http://www.bmon.co.uk/2010/12/why-does-one-page-do-better-than-others/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 18:00:26 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Chris Rand</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Google Webmaster Central]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmon.co.uk/?p=2709</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>A really interesting new set of data has crept into Google Webmaster Tools which you might like to take a look at. (If you don&#039;t have Google Webmaster Tools running on your site, give your website designer a good slap, &#8230;</p><p><p><a
href="http://www.bmon.co.uk/2010/12/why-does-one-page-do-better-than-others/">Why does one page do better than others?</a></p></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A really interesting new set of data has crept into <strong>Google Webmaster Tools</strong> which you might like to take a look at.<em> (If you don&#039;t have Google Webmaster Tools running on your site, give your website designer a good slap, and then join the <a
href="http://www.bmon.co.uk/the-insider-programme/">Insider Programme</a> for 2011 so you don&#039;t let things like this past you again).</em> It&#039;s called &#034;Search queries with top pages&#034; and here&#039;s how <a
href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/12/webmaster-tools-holiday-update.html">Google describes it</a>:</p><p><em>&#034;Now when you visit the search queries feature in Webmaster Tools you&#039;ll see a new tab titled &#034;Top Pages.&#034; The &#034;Top Pages&#034; tab lists impression, click, and position data for the top pages on your site based on their performance in Google&#039;s search results. If you click on one of the individual pages listed you’ll see a list of the queries driving traffic to that page, along with impressions and number of clicks for each query. Just like in the &#034;Top queries&#034; view, you can click on a specific query to see more detailed data and evaluate how the query is performing across the whole site.&#034;</em></p><p>I love this, and have just spent an hour finding out some intriguing data about one of my sites. And it won&#039;t be an hour wasted, because I think I can use the information to get a lot more traffic.</p><p><img
src="http://www.bmon.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/search-queries.gif" alt="" title="Search queries feature on Google Webmaster Tools" width="590" height="466" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-2710" /></p><p><p><a
href="http://www.bmon.co.uk/2010/12/why-does-one-page-do-better-than-others/">Why does one page do better than others?</a></p></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.bmon.co.uk/2010/12/why-does-one-page-do-better-than-others/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Protect your private parts</title><link>http://www.bmon.co.uk/2010/10/protect-your-private-parts/</link> <comments>http://www.bmon.co.uk/2010/10/protect-your-private-parts/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:00:37 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Chris Rand</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Google Webmaster Central]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.bmon.co.uk/?p=2431</guid> <description><![CDATA[<p>When a search engine comes round to your website to look for new and changed pages, the first thing it does is look for a file called &#034;robots.txt&#034;. Type it in after your company&#039;s domain name to see if you &#8230;</p><p><p><a
href="http://www.bmon.co.uk/2010/10/protect-your-private-parts/">Protect your private parts</a></p></p>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When a search engine comes round to your website to look for new and changed pages, the first thing it does is look for a file called &#034;robots.txt&#034;. Type it in after your company&#039;s domain name to see if you have one, like this: <a
href="http://www.bmon.co.uk/robots.txt">www.bmon.co.uk/robots.txt</a>. This small file (although it&#039;s not always small, <a
href="http://www.google.com/robots.txt">look at Google&#039;s</a>) tells the search engine &#034;robots&#034; what parts of your website not to &#034;crawl&#034; and by implication, what parts &#8211; with any luck &#8211; you want it to include in its indexes.</p><p>Why would you block a search engine from visiting parts of your site? There are many reasons, such as parts of the site being duplicates of other parts, or sections being internal and private. Perhaps most important is the sad fact that the web is way too big for the search engines, and unless you&#039;re unfeasibly highly-ranked, they&#039;re not going to index everything you have to offer. So it makes sense to section off anything you don&#039;t really care about, and focus on directing the search engines to the pages you want people to visit.</p><p>If you can&#039;t think of anything you&#039;d want to direct the search engines away from, then it might not be necessary to have a robots.txt file, although I like to include one anyway, because it just goes against the grain to serve up &#034;page not found&#034; codes, even to search engine robots. You can also give the search engines more detailed requests on a page level &#8211; see <a
href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/03/using-robots-meta-tag.html">Using the Robots Meta Tag</a> on the Google Webmaster Central Blog for more information. If you have a web designer on call, it might be worth asking if your robots.txt file is up to date and doing what you want. But also ensure they&#039;ve read <a
href="http://www.seomoz.org/blog/serious-robotstxt-misuse-high-impact-solutions">Serious Robots.txt Misuse and High Impact Solutions</a> and don&#039;t go blocking off pages which are linked to externally, or make similar mistakes.</p><p><p><a
href="http://www.bmon.co.uk/2010/10/protect-your-private-parts/">Protect your private parts</a></p></p>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.bmon.co.uk/2010/10/protect-your-private-parts/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
